Should Latin American countries legalize marijuana?
Against
No links on the Against side have been added yet
4
Arguments
(13 Replies)
Min upvotes
-
5Ana Luisa Oct 04, 2012
Yes! Freedom to choose!
People should be free to do whatever they want with their lives as long as are not invading with the freedom of others. This includes consuming marijuana. If I want to consume marijuana why is someone whom I do not know going to tell me I shouldn't. Who has to live with the consequences of the personal decisions I make, the government or I? Furthermore, making drugs illegal fosters the business of drug gangs who perform thousands of horrific killings annually. The war on illegal drugs also diverts police resources from focusing on other crimes.
-
4Marialexandra Garcia Oct 04, 2012
Not only should Latin American countries legalize marijuana, the US should legalize drugs, starting with marijuana. If we can learn anything from history, and comparing the prohibition period to the legalizing marijuana topic, it would be common sense to see how legalizing marijuana can be much more beneficial for the economy, the so-called-war on drugs, etc. Not to mention keeping it illegal is just another way for the government to tell us what to do and how to live our lives.
-
3Marialexandra Garcia Oct 04, 2012
Not only should Latin American countries legalize marijuana, the US should legalize drugs, starting with marijuana. If we can learn anything from history, and comparing the prohibition period to the legalizing marijuana topic, it would be common sense to see how legalizing marijuana can be much more beneficial for the economy, the so-called-war on drugs, etc. Not to mention keeping it illegal is just another way for the government to tell us what to do and how to live our lives.
-
-
5Pablo Osinaga Oct 04, 2012
No - Marijuana usage would skyrocket among the most at-risk semgments of the poplation
-
8Pablo Osinaga Oct 04, 2012
While personal liberties are important and in principle it would seem that legalizing marijuana would be an important step in a more free society direction, the repercussions of such policy need to be carefully considered - particularly in a region like Latin America.
Today, the middle and upper class people that want to use Marijuana can definitely do it and they are not penalized or prosecuted for that at all - so the net effect on that part of the population would be negligible.
On the contrary, the more at-risk part of the population, those kids that do not study, do not work - a big chunk of the Latin American youth today, would be presented with a very accesible, low cost, socially accepted, marketed, etc etc passtime. It would cost significantly less than today and its usage would skyrocket - not something we want to encourage today.
-
6Juan Benegas Lynch Oct 04, 2012
[Hola Pablo]
Agree with Pablo in that Marijuana is not something government should encourage (as a matter of fact i believe gov should not encourage ANYTHING).
But that is not the issue. the issue is whether marijuana should be legal or not. Also, respecting liberties and not having bureaucrats decide what is good and bad does not equal 'encouraging marijuana'.
I respect everybody's right not to trust themselves with important decisions if they think they cant handle it. I do not respect other people's right to have someone (ie bureocrats) make decisions for someone else (me or in Pablo's argument the 'at-risk' part of the population).
-
-
4Ariel Kirsman Oct 04, 2012
I agree with Pablo Osinaga's point. It's difficult to make an opinion, it's a subject that has many view points. But here we go - for adults, I would legalize. But at the price of putting in place stronger penalties than existing ones to those that are related to minors in its consumption in any way. Not sure whether that's achiveable, but definitely could be taken as a vision.
-
4Luis Perez Oct 04, 2012
I do not agree with the premise that it would sky rocket. Already in the US I would say a big majority of the population uses marijuana, even when compared to other countries with more laxed laws (Netherlands).
-
2E Jay Chavez Nov 06, 2012
Unfortunately that fear isn't supported in the data for countries where drugs were legalized. Portugal recently experienced this without the major adverse effects you cite as a concern.
-
-
0Sebastian Moser Nov 09, 2012
I disagree, because with alcohol, a similarly low-risk (doesn't completely destroy one's body) drug available. Legalization of Marijuana on the other hand would enable planting and selling the product legally, taking away a significant revenue stream that provides huge up-selling opportunities for organized crime organizations.
There's an important difference between decriminalization (not being prosecuted for owning small amounts of the drug) and legalization (having production and sales a completely legal, regulateable business). Decriminalization is a great way if the only goal is to protect civil liberties. If the question is seen in the context of the War on Drugs, though, legalization is the only way to hurt drug producers and distributors significantly.
-
-
5Juan Benegas Lynch Oct 04, 2012
Only moral reason to forbid something is if it interferes with other people's rights
PS: interfere with other people sometimes not even that,
-
5Juan Benegas Lynch Oct 04, 2012
PS: interfere with other people sometimes might not even be enough, but if it doesn't, it shouldn't be illegal. Marijuana clearly doesn't (at least for the most part, e.g., driving under the influence, smoking in public areas, etc are might be issues to consider).
-
5Pablo Osinaga Oct 04, 2012
Well - it does interefere with other people. If you agree with the fact that legalizing would increase the number of people smoking and therefore increase the number of potential people with addiction problems, particularly among the at-risk population - then that's interfering with the society as a whole ! Since we are all better off if we avoid addictions and most people are part of a productive society. So the argument of individual liberties need to be put in the context of interference of society as a whole. We are all part of a community, society, etc.
-
3Juan Benegas Lynch Oct 04, 2012
Pablo, I meant 'interfere with other people's rights', not 'interfere with other people'. Let's make it tangible: what right do you have that me (juan) smoking weed would break? (for simplicity purposes assume i smoke it at my own home, then we can expand from there).
ps: i don't do drugs other than alcohol, and sometimes tobacco, and other stuff that FDA approves, mostly OTC. but i am sure if i ever get screened by a recruiter this will really help my case hahahaha.
-
-
-
-
7Luis Perez Oct 08, 2012
The illegalization has provided insurmountable funds to the cartels
It is almost impossible for the governments to confront and control these groups.
-
Discussion Stats
- Views: 407
- Arguments: 4
- Replies: 13
Activity Feed
- Reply added by Jon Adler on Fri Nov 09, 2012
- Reply added by Sebastian Moser on Fri Nov 09, 2012
- Reply added by E Jay Chavez on Tue Nov 06, 2012
- Reply added by Ana Luisa on Wed Oct 17, 2012
- Argument added by Luis Perez on Mon Oct 08, 2012
- Discussion started by The Counterpoint on Oct 03, 2012
For
The illegalization has provided insurmountable funds to the cartels
1 Replies
Reply in: Support Dispute
But we have don't have permission to:
Yes! Freedom to choose!
2 Replies
Reply in: Support Dispute
But we have don't have permission to:
Only moral reason to forbid something is if it interferes with other people's rights
3 Replies
Reply in: Support Dispute
But we have don't have permission to:
Against
No - Marijuana usage would skyrocket among the most at-risk semgments of the poplation
7 Replies
Reply in: Support Dispute
But we have don't have permission to: